Description: Fields:lowparceli - APN Number for lot of multiunit dwellingsparcelid- APN Numberfloororder - Building Floorc_user - Created Userc_date - Created Datelast_edit - Last Edited Userlast_edate - Last Edited Dategtg_review - Notes on Parcel Reviewgtg_notes - Notes from GTG Teamcountynote - Solano County GIS Staff Notesdata_note - Data Notestaxmapno - Number of the tax map associated with the parcelgis_acre - Measured Acreage Value Xcentroid - X Centroid Value Ycentroid - Y Centroid Value taxmaplink - Link to Tax Map propurl - Link to Property Characteristics asmtnum – PIN rollyear - Current Tax Roll Year acres - Recorded Acreage Value lotsize – Lot Size Square Footage usecode - Use Code use_desc - Use Code Description subdiv – Subdivision Name qclass – Quality Class yrblt - Year Built status – PIN Status valland - Land Value valimp – Improvement Value valtv – Trees & Vine Value valfme – Fixed Machinery & Equipment Value valpp – Personal Property Value valpen – Penalty Value situs – Site Addresssitenum – Site Number siteroad – Site Street Name p_address – Site Number & Street sitecity – Site City Name unitbldg – Site Unit/Building wa – Williamson Act (YS/NO) wa_status – Williamson Act Status Code wacontno – Williamson Act Contract Number wa_prime – Total Prime Acreage noprimacre – Total Nonprime Acreage exacre – Total Excluded Acreage p_create - Parcel Creation Date p_inactive - Parcel Inactivation Date firs_floor - First Floor Area sec_floor - Second Floor Area thir_floor - Third Area other_area - Other Area garage - Garage Area total_area - Total Area stories - Number of Stories bedroom - Number of Bedrooms bathroom - Number of Bathrooms dining - Dining Room (Space, YS, NO) family - Family Room (Space, YS, NO) other_room - Number of Other Rooms utility - Utility Room (Space, YS, NO) rooms - Total Rooms Countfireplc – Fireplace (Space, YS, NO, 1, 2…) hvac - HVAC Code pool – Swimming Pool (Space, YS, NO) solar - Solar (Space, YS, NO) tac - TAG tac_city – TAG City Name govt_owned – Govt Owned hotype – Home Owner Exemption Type fund_fire – Fire District desc_fire - Fire District Description f_school - School District d_school – School District Description fund_water – Water District desc_water – Water District Description f_air_board – Air Board District d_air_board - Air Board District Description f_soil_cons - Soil Conservation District d_soil_cons – Soil Conservation District Description acre_diff - Acreage Difference
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: This data is maintained by Geographic Technologies Group under the guidance of Solano County. All parcels are based on the Solano County Tax Maps. If there are discrepancies, Tax Map is considered authority. However, Tax Map is not a legal document.
Description: <div style="text-align:Left;"> <div> <div> <p><span>These data were significantly updated in coordination with LAFCO in 2021. Changes to the city boundary have significant impact on many other data layers which at this time may not have been adjusted to match the new city boundary.</span></p> <p><span>Data Quality</span></p> <p><span>These data reflect an approximation of the city boundary and any dispute over the actual boundary must be resolved by looking at the original source documentation. Only a Professional Land Surveyor should be relied upon for final determination of any specific boundary. There are two known areas which are disputed. One is the boundary along Ramsey Road between Fairfield and unincorporated Solano County. The second area is south of Illinois Street in Fairfield.</span></p> <table border="1"> <tbody><tr> <th>Field</th> <th>Description</th> </tr> <tr> <td>Name</td> <td>City Name</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Agency</td> <td>Proper City Name</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <p><span>Date last updated: 05/22/2024 - Resolved geometry at City of Vallejo and City of Benicia northwestern edge</span></p> <p><span>Uploaded to Solano County GIS Portal 05/22/2024 by GIS Services Team, Solano County Department of Information Technology</span></p> <p><span></span></p> </div> </div></div>
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Data is owned by LAFCO for Solano County. Changes, edits, and revisions to the same are made by Solano County Department of Information Technology GIS Team by LAFCO authorization.
Description: ***** BACKGROUND *****In late 1996, the Dept of Conservation (DOC) surveyed state and federal agencies about the county boundary coverage they used. As a result, DOC adopted the 1:24,000 (24K) scale U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) dataset (USGS source) for their Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) but with several modifications. Detailed documentation of these changes is provided by FMMP and included in the lineage section of the metadata.A dataset named cnty24k97_1 was made available (approximately 2004) through the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection - Fire and Resource Assessment Program (CDF - FRAP) and the California Spatial Information Library (CaSIL). In late 2006, the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) reviewed cnty24k97_1. Comparisons were made to a high-quality 100K dataset (co100a/county100k from the former Teale Data Center GIS Solutions Group) and legal boundary descriptions from ( https://www.leginfo.ca.gov ). The cnty24k97_1 dataset was missing Anacapa and Santa Barbara islands. DFG added the missing islands using previously-digitized coastline data (coastn27 of State Lands Commission origin), corrected a few county boundaries, built region topology, added additional attributes, and renamed the dataset to county24k.In 2007, the California Mapping Coordinating Committee (CMCC) requested that the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) resume stewardship of the statewide county boundaries data. CAL FIRE adopted the changes made by DFG and collected additional suggestions for the county data from DFG, DOC, and local government agencies. CAL FIRE incorporated these suggestions into the latest revision, which has was renamed cnty24k09_1.***** THIS VERSION*****This version of the county dataset was created as a result of an effort to improve the coastal linework. It uses the previous interior linework from the cnty24k13_1 data, but replaces the coastal linework (including islands and inlets) based on NOAA's ERMA coastal dataset (which used NAIP 2010). In addition to the improved linework, additional coding was added to differentiate inlets and bays, islands, and manmade structures such as piers and breakers. Note that some of this coding may not be featured in this specific dataset.This dataset is one of several available datasets that were created as a group designed to work in topological sync with each other. These "paired" datasets include a full county dataset (cnty15_1_full), a basic state dataset (state15_1), an ocean dataset (ocean15_1), and country/state datasets (both full and neighbor-only - cntrystate15_1_full and cntrystate15_1_neighbor, respectively). Further details about these paired datasets can be found in their respective metadata.This specific dataset represents the basic (ie simplified) county dataset without the extra coding that can be found in the "full" dataset. In this dataset, all bays (plus bay islands and constructed features) are merged into the mainland, and coastal features (such as islands and constructed features) are not included.In November 2015, the dataset was adjusted to include a change in the Yuba-Placer county boundary from 2010 that was not yet included in the 14_1 version of the dataset (ord No 5546-B). This change constitutes the diffrence between the 15_1 and 14_1 versions of this dataset.Edited by DMachado 7/22/2024 based on Resource Management, Surveying division review of 0147-010-080 and boundary overlap in that area. Area edited manually based on comparison to associated tax map for that APN.Edited by DMachado 9/20/2024 to more closely align to the Board of Equalization data available from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, as published to the CA State GeoPortal: https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/CDTFA::boe-citycounty-1/about
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, Board of Equalization, California Department of Conservation, California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Solano DoIT
Description: Public Land Survey System: SectionsIn support of new permitting workflows associated with anticipated WellSTAR needs, the CalGEM GIS unit extended the existing BLM PLSS Township & Range grid to cover offshore areas with the 3-mile limit of California jurisdiction. The PLSS grid as currently used by CalGEM is a composite of a BLM download (the majority of the data), additions by the DPR, and polygons created by CalGEM to fill in missing areas (the Ranchos, and Offshore areas within the 3-mile limit of California jurisdiction).CalGEM is the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation, formerly the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (as of January 1, 2020).Update Frequency: As NeededData Updated: May 14, 2019 at 4:14 PMData sourced by DMachado on 09/26/2023Source: https://maps-cnra-cadoc.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/cadoc::public-land-survey-system-plss-sections/about
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Public Access; No restrictions on public use
Program Contact Name: gis_cadoc
Program Contact Email: gis@conservation.ca.gov
Color: [56, 168, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 12 Font Family: AvenirNext LT Pro Medium Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Name: Rural North Vacaville Water District Boundary
Display Field: agencyname
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: The Rural North Vacaville Water District (RNVWD) is a Community Services District formed under Government Code Section 61000 et. Seq. to develop and provide a public water distribution system. The public water distribution system serves properties within the Rural North Vacaville Water District boundaries with potable water for residential use. In addition, the Rural North Vacaville Water District provides water for fire protection by supplying water to a series of fire hydrants serving properties in the area.The RNVWD was established because of the lack of adequate available water from private wells within the rural North Vacaville area. The District is comprised of the area enveloping Cantelow Road, English Hills, Gibson Canyon and Steiger Hill. The water system was designed to supply enough water capacity to supply potable water to a maximum of 533 parcels within that area. In addition to the parcels that benefit from water service, the water system also provides fire protection benefits to an additional number of parcels within the boundaries of the District. Hence, a total of 711 parcels benefit from fire protection service from the RNVWD system.The Rural North Vacaville Water District serves only unincorporated rural Solano County north of Vacaville.
Description: Solano Irrigation District (SID) is an independent special district, a local government agency, formed in 1948. The five-member Board of Directors is elected by registered voters within the boundaries of the district. SID has entitlements for 141,000 acre feet of agricultural and domestic water for service to many areas in Solano County each year. The District is also the operator of the Solano Project, which delivers Lake Berryessa water to four cities, the Maine Prairie Water District, and SID customers. The district owns and operates the hydroelectric power plant at the base of Monticello Dam.
Description: Spatial data for levees and levee related structures within Solano County, California. This dataset was formed by merging the San Francisco Area Levees dataset from the Pacific Institute and the data from the WRD.The bay area levees map depicts the locations of levees around the San Francisco Bay Area. It was created using a combination of the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRM) data from FEMA and digitized lines from USGS 7.5 minute Topo maps and Google Earth aerial imagery. The data source for each feature is described in the Source attribute field as derived from either FEMA or from the Pacific Institute.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: ESRI, DWR, Solano DoITGIS, DFIRM, Pacific Institute, Solano County https://databasin.org/maps/new#datasets=f06a4b2890ca440497cbdc1f2f8f8ef9
Description: These data provide an accurate high-resolution shoreline compiled from imagery of CARQUINEZ STRAIT, CA This vector shoreline data is based on an office interpretation of imagery that may be suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. This metadata describes information for both the line and point shapefiles. The NGS attribution scheme 'Coastal Cartographic Object Attribute Source Table (C-COAST)' was developed to conform the attribution of various sources of shoreline data into one attribution catalog. C-COAST is not a recognized standard, but was influenced by the International Hydrographic Organization's S-57 Object-Attribute standard so the data would be more accurately translated into S-57.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: ESRI, RU.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), National Geodetic Survey (NGS) clipped to Solano County Boundaries by Solano County DoIT GIS.
Description: 8-Digit Watershed Boundary Data. Hydrologic Unit delineation are closed polygons that encompass all area draining toward the lowest point (called outlet or pour point) in the polygon. Because of varying sizes for the different hydrologic unit levels: some polygons do not include all areas up to the drainage divide, but all areas are included up to one or more other upstream hydrologic units. A unique hydrologic unit code is used to identify each hydrologic unit. The hydrologic unit codes start with the 2-digit Region number that contains the 4-, 6-, and 8-digit hydrologic units. Each hydrologic unit has a unique hydrologic code.The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) defines the areal extent of surface water drainage to a point, accounting for all land and surface areas. Watershed Boundaries are determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative boundaries or special projects, nor particular program or agency. The intent of defining Hydrologic Units (HU) for the Watershed Boundary Dataset is to establish a base-line drainage boundary framework, accounting for all land and surface areas. At a minimum, the WBD is being delineated and georeferenced to the USGS. "A hydrologic unit is a drainage area delineated to nest in a multi-level, hierarchical drainage system. Its boundaries are defined by hydrographic and topographic criteria that delineate an area of land upstream from a specific point on a river, stream or similar surface waters. A hydrologic unit can accept surface water directly from upstream drainage areas, and indirectly from associated surface areas such as remnant, non-contributing, and diversions to form a drainage area with single or multiple outlet points. Hydrologic units are only synonymous with classic watersheds when their boundaries include all the source area contributing surface water to a single defined outlet point."Dataset acquired from: https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. For details see: http://nhd.usgs.gov/wbd.html; http://www.ncgc.nrcs.usda.gov/products/datasets/watershed/; http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/.Federal standards and procedures for WBD: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/
Description: The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) defines the areal extent of surface water drainage to a point, accounting for all land and surface areas. Watershed Boundaries are determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative boundaries or special projects, nor particular program or agency. The intent of defining Hydrologic Units (HU) for the Watershed Boundary Dataset is to establish a base-line drainage boundary framework, accounting for all land and surface areas. At a minimum, the WBD is being delineated and georeferenced to the USGS. "A hydrologic unit is a drainage area delineated to nest in a multi-level, hierarchical drainage system. Its boundaries are defined by hydrographic and topographic criteria that delineate an area of land upstream from a specific point on a river, stream or similar surface waters. A hydrologic unit can accept surface water directly from upstream drainage areas, and indirectly from associated surface areas such as remnant, non-contributing, and diversions to form a drainage area with single or multiple outlet points. Hydrologic units are only synonymous with classic watersheds when their boundaries include all the source area contributing surface water to a single defined outlet point."Dataset acquired from: https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. For details see: http://nhd.usgs.gov/wbd.html; http://www.ncgc.nrcs.usda.gov/products/datasets/watershed/; http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/.Federal standards and procedures for WBD: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/
Description: The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) defines the areal extent of surface water drainage to a point, accounting for all land and surface areas. Watershed Boundaries are determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative boundaries or special projects, nor particular program or agency. The intent of defining Hydrologic Units (HU) for the Watershed Boundary Dataset is to establish a base-line drainage boundary framework, accounting for all land and surface areas. At a minimum, the WBD is being delineated and georeferenced to the USGS. "A hydrologic unit is a drainage area delineated to nest in a multi-level, hierarchical drainage system. Its boundaries are defined by hydrographic and topographic criteria that delineate an area of land upstream from a specific point on a river, stream or similar surface waters. A hydrologic unit can accept surface water directly from upstream drainage areas, and indirectly from associated surface areas such as remnant, non-contributing, and diversions to form a drainage area with single or multiple outlet points. Hydrologic units are only synonymous with classic watersheds when their boundaries include all the source area contributing surface water to a single defined outlet point."Dataset acquired from: https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. For details see: http://nhd.usgs.gov/wbd.html; http://www.ncgc.nrcs.usda.gov/products/datasets/watershed/; http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/.Federal standards and procedures for WBD: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/
Description: The NHD is a feature-based database that interconnects and uniquely identifies the stream segments or reaches that make up the nation's surface water drainage system. NHD data was originally developed at 1:100,000-scale and exists at that scale for the whole country. This high-resolution NHD, generally developed at 1:24,000/1:12,000 scale, adds detail to the original 1:100,000-scale NHD. Local resolution NHD is being developed where partners and data exist. The NHD contains reach codes for networked features, flow direction, names, and centerline representations for areal water bodiesThe NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.
Description: Polygon spatial data providing information on reclamation (levee) districts in Solano County. Heavy rains in late December 1996 and early January 1997 caused extensive flooding in many areas of northern California. Forty-eight (48) counties were declared federal disaster areas. The FEMA disaster reference number is FEMA-1155-DR-CA. Early in the disaster response effort, it became apparent that there was no single comprehensive source of flood control information. US Army Corps of Engineers, FEMA, and OES teamed to jointly compile a database of federal, state and local flood control structures in California. Since the passing of the Reclamation District Act in 1855, California has managed swamp and overflow lands in the Sacramento and San Joaquin River delta through organizations known as reclamation or Levee districts. Each district is responsible for maintaining levees and bank protection projects.
Description: Dixon RCD was originally formed to construct, operate, and maintain the Dixon Drain, a 70-mile long system of ditches designed to prevent or alleviate the flooding of agricultural lands. Dixon RCD lays on both, Solano and Yolo Counties. The drainage facilities were constructed beginning with 1952 through the mid -1960’s with the goal to provide winter drainage in moderate storms equivalent to a 10 year 24 hour storm event. In order to operate this system the District entered in to 3 different agreements with Reclamation District 2068, Maine Prairie Water District and the City of Dixon. For more details, please contact Michell McIntyre, at 707-439-3898, mmcintyre@solanocounty.com, or directly, the RCDs: http://www.dixonrcd.org/;
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This dataset was digitized from a scanned map published by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Four ranges in probable yield, based on adequacy of them range in yield for major beneficial uses of water, are given. The ranges are related to the concept of normal probability; that is, well yields are expressed in terms of the 68- and 95-percent levels of chance. For example, there is a 68-percent chance that wells in areas designated A well yield from 0.5 to 5 gpm (gallons per minute) and a 95-percent chance that wells in such areas will yield from 0.1 to 10 gpm, assuming operation without excessive drawdown. Thus, it can be expected that most wells drilled in area A will obtain water supplies marginal to adequate for domestic purposes, that most wells will yield fewer than 10 gpm, and that some wells will be virtually dry.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: This report was prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Department of Housing and Urban Development as part of the San Francisco Bay region environment and resources planning study. The work was done intermittently between 1970 and 1972 under the general supervision of R. S. Lord and L. R. Peterson, successive district chiefs in charge of water-resources investigation; in California, and under the immediate supervision of L. E Young, chief of the Menlo Park subdistrict.
Name: Suisun Marsh Protection Plan Management Areas
Display Field: type
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Primary and Secondary Management Areas of the Suisun Marsh as described in the BCDC's Suisun Marsh Protection Plan.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>A shapefile depiction of BCDC's Primary and Secondary Management Areas of the Suisun Marsh. Data was developed to assist with cartographic depiction of the Marsh and therefore should not be used for jurisdictional purposes.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Please see Supplemental information for updates. This data is a depiction of the Primary Management Area of the Suisun Marsh generated by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC). It is only a graphic depiction of the Primary Management Area and does not reflect the actual jurisdiction of BCDC. Per the Suisun Marsh Preservation Act, the "Suisun Marsh" or "marsh" means water covered areas, tidal marsh, diked-off wetlands, seasonal marshes, lowland grasslands, upland grasslands and cultivated lands specified on the map identified in Section 16 of that chapter of the Statutes of the 1977-78 Regular Session enacting this division. It includes both the primary and secondary management areas as shown on the Suisun Marsh Protection Plan Map and includes the entire right-of-way of any state highway that is designated as a portion of the boundary of the marsh. For additional information on BCDC's jurisdiction see the San Francisco Bay Plan, the Suisun Marsh Protection Plan and the Suisun Marsh Act. All information can be found at www.bcdc.ca.gov. Data based on map "Boundaries of the Suisun Marsh" in the Suisun Marsh Protection Plan, SFBCDC, 1976.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Data extracted 09/26/2023</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Data last updated 11/09/2021</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Source: https://data-bcdc.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/BCDC::suisun-marsh-protection-plan-management-areas/about</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Todd Hallenbeck
San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission
Description: The Urban Areas dataset was compiled on May 31, 2023 from the United States Census Bureau (USCB) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. There are 6 Urban Areas in this dataset, one each in Benicia, Davis, Dixon, Fairfield, Rio Vista, and Vallejo. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the urban footprint.Downloaded from https://www.census.gov/geo/partnerships/pvs/partnership23v2/st06_ca.html by PMead on 02/29/2024, Solano County Department of Information Technology. Last updated on source: November 2023Data Uploaded 03/17/24 by DMachado
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Acknowledgment of the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, and the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) [distributor]
Description: Road centerline feature class is actively undergoing edits and is updated nightly. It is actively undergoing edits and is updated on a monthly basis. It follows the CalOES schema and has additional fields as required by Solano County, Geographic Technologies Group (GTG) (data stewards), and Bradshaw Consulting Services (BCS) (data host).Note: "Updated" field in Item Description may not be accurate.Fields:RCL_NGUID - Road Centerline NENA Globally Unique IDFullAddress - Full Address FullAddr_Label_Abbrv - Abbreviated LabelFullAddr_Label - Full Address LabelRoadOwner - Road OwnerRoadClass - Road ClassGTG_Flag - GTG Flag field to categorize anomaliesGTG_Notes - GTG Notes field to describe anomalyAdNumPre_L - Left Address Number PrefixAdNumPre_R - Right Address Number PrefixFromAddr_L - Left From AddressToAddr_L - Left To AddressFromAddr_R - Right From AddressToAddr_R - Right To AddressParity_L - Parity LeftParity_R - Parity RightSt_PreMod - Street Name Pre ModifierSt_PreDir - Street Name Pre DirectionalSt_PreTyp - Street Name Pre TypeSt_PreSep - Street Name Type SeparatorSt_Name - Street NameSt_PosType - Street Name Post TypeSt_PosDir - Street Name Post DirectionalSt_PosMod - Street Name Post ModifierLSt_PreDir - Legacy Street Name Pre DirectionalLSt_Name - Legacy Street NameLSt_Type - Legacy Street Name TypeLSt_PosDir - Legacy Street Name Post DirectionalESN_L - ESN LeftESN_R - ESN RightMSAGComm_L - MSAG Community Name LeftMSAGComm_R - MSAG Community Name RightCountry_L - Country LeftCountry_R - Country RightState_L - State LeftState_R - State RightCounty_L - County LeftCounty_R - County RightIncMuni_L - Incorporated Municipality LeftIncMuni_R - Incorporated Municipality RightUnincCom_L - Unincorporated Community LeftUnincCom_R - Unincorporated Community RightNbrhdCom_L - Neighborhood Community LeftNbrhdCom_R - Neighborhood Community RightPostCode_L - Postal Code LeftPostCode_R - Postal Code RightPostComm_L - Postal Community Name LeftPostComm_R - Postal Community Name RightOneWay - One-WaySpeedLimit - Speed LimitValid_L - Validation LeftValid_R - Validation RightDiscrpAgID - Discrepancy Agency IDDateUpdate - Date UpdatedEffective - Effective DateExpire - Expiration DateGC_Exception - GC QC Exception Codecreated_user - Editor tracking (who created the data)created_date - Editor tracking (when was the data created)last_edited_user - Editor tracking (who last edited the data)last_edited_date - Editor tracking (when was the data last edited)GlobalID - Unique Global IDSEGMENT_ID - BCS Segment IDNAME_ID - BCS Name IDANOMALY - BCS Anomaly trackerfromElev - BCS from elevation measuretoElev - BCS to elevation measurefromToCost - BCS from-to cost measuretoFromCost - BCS to-from cost measure
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: This data is maintained by Geographic Technologies Group under the guidance of Solano County.
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 10000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 30000.0 Max. Scale: 10000.0 Label Placement: esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong Label Expression: N/A Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
postcomm_l
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Postal Community Name Left, length: 40
, Coded Values:
[Benicia: Benicia]
, [Dixon: Dixon]
, [Fairfield: Fairfield]
, ...4 more...
)
postcomm_r
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Postal Community Name Right, length: 40
, Coded Values:
[Benicia: Benicia]
, [Dixon: Dixon]
, [Fairfield: Fairfield]
, ...4 more...
)
oneway
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: One-Way, length: 2
, Coded Values:
[TF: One-way traveling from TO node to FROM node]
, [B: Travel in both directions allowed]
, [FT: One-way traveling from FROM node to TO node]
)
Description: Nut Tree Airport is a general aviation (GA) airport located in Vacaville CA roughly halfway between San Francisco and Sacramento. The Airport is located on the I-80 corridor and has easy access to both Interstates 80 and 505.The Airport consists of 286 acres and receives approximately 102,700 aircraft operations each year. The Airport is home to 201 based aircraft and has 117 hangars and other various commercial office spaces. The Airport’s 4,700 foot long runway can accommodate a variety of aircraft from single engine to twins to small/medium sized business jets.Nut Tree Airport Master Plan Noise Contours:The 1988 Airport/Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) includes supporting policies related to aircraft noise. The California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Subchapter 6 indicates that the State of California prohibits four land use types to be located within the 65 decibel (dB) Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) exposure level, which include public and private schools, places of public worship, residential dwellings, and hospitals. In order to enforce these noise regulations, each airport is required to develop a noise exposure map delineating the 65 dB CNEL noise contour location. Noise policies described in the 1988 ALUCP indicates that the maximum CNEL which shall be considered normally acceptable for residential areas in the vicinity of Nut Tree Airport is 60 rather than 6511. Also, the 2007 City of Vacaville General Plan and the Vacaville Municipal code have also adopted the 60 dB CNEL noise level as the residential compatibility threshold. The noise contours illustrated in the 2007 General Plan are based upon the 1993 Nut Tree Airport Master Plan 2011 future noise contours. These contours were anticipated to be incorporated into the 1988 ALUCP; however, the 2007 General Plan indicates that the 1988 ALUCP has not been amended to incorporate the 1993 Nut Tree Airport Master Plan noise contours. As stated above, the State of California restricts the four incompatible land uses within the 65 CNEL exposure level. Further analysis and potential recommendations for changes to adopted noise contours will be included in later chapters of the Master Plan. The 2011 55, 60, and 65 CNEL noise contours based upon the 1993 Master Plan are presented in the mapping data. It is important to note that these 2011 noise contours are based on a forecast included in the 1993 Airport Master Plan of 180,000 annual aircraft operations. Actual 2009 aircraft operations were estimated to be 101,500.
Description: Nut Tree Airport is a general aviation (GA) airport located in Vacaville CA roughly halfway between San Francisco and Sacramento. The Airport is located on the I-80 corridor and has easy access to both Interstates 80 and 505.The Airport consists of 286 acres and receives approximately 102,700 aircraft operations each year. The Airport is home to 201 based aircraft and has 117 hangars and other various commercial office spaces. The Airport’s 4,700 foot long runway can accommodate a variety of aircraft from single engine to twins to small/medium sized business jets.Nut Tree Airport Master Plan Nut Tree Airport/Land Use Compatibility Plan:The 1988 ALUCP defines the airport compatible land use zones around the Airport as Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones. New development in these zones must be compatible with the plan. The six compatibility zones, the associated impact element, maximum densities, and required percentage of open space are described in the Nut Tree Airport Master Plan Airport Land Use Compatibility Criteria. The 1988 ALUCP also includes supporting policies related to aircraft noise, airspace protection, and aircraft overflights.Following the completion of the Development Concepts and Alternatives Analysis chapter of the Airport Master Plan, a review of the 1988 airport land use zones and compatibility criteria will be completed to determine if changes are necessary. The land use zones and compatibility will also be reviewed to determine consistency with the latest California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, published in January of 2002. It is also important to note that any recommended changes to the 1988 airport land use zones and compatibility criteria should be considered and incorporated into both the City of Vacaville and the Solano County General Plans, as well as in the Vacaville Municipal Code. Zone A: Clear Zone or Primary SurfaceZone B: Inner Approach/Departure ZoneZone C: Outer Approach/Departure Zone or Adjacent to RunwayZone D: Extended Approach/Departure ZoneZone E: Adjacent to Runway or Final ApproachZone F: Other Airport Environment
Description: Rio Vista Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP)Rio Vista Airport features six safety zones, numbered 1 through 6. A series of criteria is provided that reflect the specific requirements and regulations for each safety zone. General Standards describe the specific requirements for densities and intensities for each zone. Noise Criteria provide the development limitations within each zone based on the noise contours from the Airport. Safety Criteria explain the particular land uses that are not permitted or may require ALUC review. Airspace Protection Criteria discuss specific requirements for development based on 14 CFR Part 77 imaginary surfaces at the Airport. Finally, Avigation Easement Dedication describes the avigation easement requirements for parcels located within Safety Zones 1, 2, 3.Safety Zone 1 consists of the two Rio Vista runways, together with immediately adjoining areas within the runway protection zones (RPZs). The dimensions of the RPZs are set in accordance with FAA criteria.Safety Zone 2 comprises the inner approach and departure areas immediately beyond and surrounding Safety Zone 1. Typically, residential uses are restricted, apart from infill within already developed areas. Non-residential uses that include agriculture, non-group recreational uses (that result in minimal concentrations of people), storage of low-hazard materials, low-intensity light industrial land uses, and auto, aircraft, and marine repair services are all normally allowed within this zone.Safety Zone 3 contains the areas where aircraft turn as they approach or depart the runway. Uses allowed in this safety zone include greenhouses, low-hazard materials storage, mini-storage, warehouses, light industrial uses, and vehicle repair services, as well as uses allowed in Safety Zone 2. Very low residential densities and low-intensity offices and commercial uses are permitted within this zone, while uses with higher concentrations of people and children are prohibited.Safety Zone 4 covers the outer approach and departure surfaces for the Airport and extends beyond Safety Zone 2. Normally, restaurants, retail, and industrial uses are allowed in this zone, as well as uses that are allowed in Safety Zone 3. Higher intensity retail uses and offices are to be avoided in this zone, while buildings and uses that result in larger assemblages of people and children are prohibited.Safety Zone 5 is the sideline zone that runs outside and parallel to Runways 15-33 and 7-25. Normally, all uses permitted in Zone 4 and common aviation-related activities are allowed, provided they satisfy FAA height and airspace protection criteria. Uses limited in Safety Zone 3 are also limited in Zone 5. All residential uses are to be prohibited unless they are airport related; and higher-intensity non-residential uses that result in higher assemblages of people, including children, are prohibited.Safety Zone 6 comprises the traffic pattern zone and Inner WHA Boundary for the Airport. This larger zone covers regular traffic patterns and entry routes to and exit routes from the Airport. The 55 dB CNEL contour is located within Safety Zone 6. While residential uses in this zone are only restricted in relation to noise and overflight impacts, no other prohibitions exist within this zone. However, outdoor stadiums and similar uses that would result in very high intensities of people should be avoided
Name: Wildlife Hazard Area (WHA) and Airport Influence Area (AIA)
Display Field: name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: Rio Vista Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP)Section 2.2 Geographic Scope The Airport Influence Area (AIA) is comprised of portions of Solano County and the city of Rio Vista that surround the Airport, and encompasses Safety Zones 1 through 6, the Airport’s 2035 noise contours, the Airport’s Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 77 surfaces, the Airport’s overflight notification area, and the Inner and Outer Wildlife Hazard Analysis (WHA) areas.Section 5.8 Wildlife HazardsThis data depicts two wildlife hazard zones, the Inner Wildlife Hazard Analysis (WHA) Boundary and the Outer WHA Boundary, which contain specific development requirements. The Inner WHA Boundary is coterminous with the Traffic Pattern Boundary as represented by Safety Zone 6. The Outer WHA Boundary is located five miles from the farthest edge of the Airport’s Air Operations Area (AOA), which the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends for any hazardous wildlife attractant if the attractant could cause hazardous wildlife movement into or across the approach or departure airspace. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B provides guidance for minimizing the risks that certain wildlife species pose to aircraft. The Inner WHA Boundary is based on the fact that Rio Vista Airport serves piston-powered aircraft. Together, these perimeters encompass all safety zones and present additional conditions on certain types of land uses that are known to attract wildlife that are hazardous to aircraft operations. See FAA Circular 150/5200-33B in Appendix G for specific land use details and restrictions, including a description of conflicting land uses. The ALUC shall apply the following Wildlife Hazard (WH) policies within the AIA. The following policies do not apply to existing land uses.WH-1 Known Wildlife Hazards in Solano County - Inner WHA Boundary:Within the Inner WHA Boundary, new or expanded land uses involving discretionary review that has the potential to attract wildlife and cause bird strikes are required to prepare a wildlife hazard analysis (WHA). Reviewing agencies shall prepare a WHA for projects that have the potential to attract wildlife that could cause bird strikes. Expansion of existing wildlife attractants includes newly created areas and increases in enhanced or restored areas. The WHA must demonstrate wildlife attractants that may pose hazards to aircraft in flight will be minimized.WH-2 Known Wildlife Hazards in Solano County - Outer WHA Boundary:Outside the Inner WHA Boundary but within the Outer WHA Boundary, as shown on Figure 8, any new or expanded land use involving discretionary review that has the potential to attract the movement of wildlife and cause bird strikes are required to prepare a WHA. Expansion of existing wildlife attractants includes newly created areas and increases in enhanced or restored areas. All reasonably feasible mitigation measures must be incorporated into the planned land use. The WHA must demonstrate wildlife movement that may pose hazards to aircraft in flight will be minimized.WH-3 Environmental Review Compliance:1. All discretionary projects located within the Inner WHA Boundary or Outer WHA Boundary are required to consider the potential for the project to attract hazardous wildlife, wildlife movement, or bird strike hazards as part of the environmental review process required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).2. Because biological and hazard impacts are required to be examined in the context of CEQA compliance, it is anticipated that most projects will develop the information necessary to prepare a WHA and demonstrate compliance with this Policy WH-3 as part of the CEQA process, and that separate documentation will not be needed. Proposed projects within the Inner WHA Boundary that have the potential to cause a significant adverse impact under Policy WH-1, with or without mitigation, shall be reviewed by the ALUC (including but not limited to projects requiring an environmental impact report, mitigated negative declaration, or equivalent document).Data source: Rio Vista Airport - Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan - Figure 2blobdload.aspx (solanocounty.com)chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=34763Last updated on source: May 10, 2018Date published in source: May 10, 2018Updated for Solano County GIS: 04/24/2024. Uploaded to Solano County GIS Portal, GIS Services Team, Solano County Department of Information Technology.
Description: Affected Land Use Jurisdictions — The County of Solano and City of Rio Vista, both located within the Rio Vista AIA, and the County of Sacramento and City of Isleton,2 which are partially located within the AIA inside the Wildlife Hazard Analysis (WHA) five-mile boundary, as defined herein, shall utilize these policies as the basis for: Modifying their respective general plans, zoning ordinances, and other local land use policies to assure that future land use development will be compatible with aircraft operations. Making planning decisions regarding specific development proposals involving the lands impacted by aircraft activity.
Description: Compatibility Zone A (see Figure 1) consists of the Travis AFB runways (the two existing major runways and the ALZ, as described in Section 4.8), together with immediately adjoining areas within the runway primary surface and clear zones. The dimensions are set in accordance with FAA and Air Force criteria.
Description: Travis Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility PlanSection 4.1 Compatibility Zones EstablishedIn total, the Air Force Base features six compatibility zones, A, B1, B2, C, D, and E, as well as two overlay zones, the Assault Landing Zone (ALZ) Training Overlay Zone and the Height Review Overlay Zone. Each of the compatibility zones and overlay zones are generally described with tabular information relating to density and intensity requirements and additional zone-specific criteria. The Plan provides additional general, noise, safety, aircraft protection, and overflight regulations and supporting criteria that apply to each of the compatibility zones.Section 4.9 Height Review Overlay ZoneThe Height Review Overlay Zone covers locations where the terrain exceeds or comes within 35 feet of any of the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 airspace protection surfaces for Travis AFB. The Height Review zone overlays portions of the other compatibility zones, and is generally located in portions of Cement Hill and the Vaca Mountains, to the northwest of Travis AFB and between the cities of Fairfield and Vacaville.
Description: In total, the Air Force Base features six compatibility zones, A, B1, B2, C, D, and E, as well as two overlay zones, the ALZ Training Overlay Zone and the Height Review Overlay Zone. Below, each of the compatibility zones and overlay zones are generally described with tabular information relating to density and intensity requirements and additional zone-specific criteria. These details are also summarized in Table 1. Following this section, the Plan provides additional general, noise, safety, aircraft protection, and overflight regulations and supporting criteria that apply to each of the compatibility zones.Figure 4 depicts two wildlife hazard zones, the Bird Strike Hazard Zone and the Outer Perimeter, which contain specific development requirements. The Bird Strike Hazard Zone is delineated by a radius 14,500 feet from the runway centerlines. The Outer Perimeter is located five miles from the farthest edge of the Air Force Base’s air operations area (AOA), which the FAA recommends for any hazardous wildlife attractant if the attractant could cause hazardous wildlife movement into or across the approach or departure airspace. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B provides guidance for minimizing the risks that certain wildlife species pose to aircraft. The Outer Perimeter is based on the fact that Travis AFB serves turbine powered aircraft. Together, these perimeters encompass portions of all compatibility zones and present additional conditions on certain types of land uses that are known to attract wildlife that are hazardous to aircraft operations. See FAA Circular 150/5200-33B in Appendix G for specific land use details and restrictions, including a description of conflicting land uses.
Description: In total, the Air Force Base features six compatibility zones, A, B1, B2, C, D, and E, as well as two overlay zones, the ALZ Training Overlay Zone and the Height Review Overlay Zone. Below, each of the compatibility zones and overlay zones are generally described with tabular information relating to density and intensity requirements and additional zone-specific criteria. These details are also summarized in Table 1. Following this section, the Plan provides additional general, noise, safety, aircraft protection, and overflight regulations and supporting criteria that apply to each of the compatibility zones.Figure 4 depicts two wildlife hazard zones, the Bird Strike Hazard Zone and the Outer Perimeter, which contain specific development requirements. The Bird Strike Hazard Zone is delineated by a radius 14,500 feet from the runway centerlines. The Outer Perimeter is located five miles from the farthest edge of the Air Force Base’s air operations area (AOA), which the FAA recommends for any hazardous wildlife attractant if the attractant could cause hazardous wildlife movement into or across the approach or departure airspace. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B provides guidance for minimizing the risks that certain wildlife species pose to aircraft. The Outer Perimeter is based on the fact that Travis AFB serves turbine powered aircraft. Together, these perimeters encompass portions of all compatibility zones and present additional conditions on certain types of land uses that are known to attract wildlife that are hazardous to aircraft operations. See FAA Circular 150/5200-33B in Appendix G for specific land use details and restrictions, including a description of conflicting land uses.
Description: Travis Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility PlanSection 4.1 Compatibility Zones EstablishedIn total, the Air Force Base features six compatibility zones, A, B1, B2, C, D, and E, as well as two overlay zones, the Assault Landing Zone (ALZ) Training Overlay Zone and the Height Review Overlay Zone. Each of the compatibility zones and overlay zones are generally described with tabular information relating to density and intensity requirements and additional zone-specific criteria. The Plan provides additional general, noise, safety, aircraft protection, and overflight regulations and supporting criteria that apply to each of the compatibility zones.Section 4.2 Compatibility Zone A Compatibility Zone A consists of the Travis AFB runways (the two existing major runways and the ALZ, together with immediately adjoining areas within the runway primary surface and clear zones. The dimensions are set in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Air Force criteria.Section 4.3 Compatibility Zone B1 Compatibility Zone B1 comprises Accident Potential Zone I (APZ I) as defined by the Air Force. This is an area of substantial risk situated within 7,500 feet of the runway ends. It is also subject to potential noise levels in excess of 80 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL).Section 4.4 Compatibility Zone B2Compatibility Zone B2 is comparable to Accident Potential Zone II (APZ II) as indicated in Air Force guidelines, but is expanded to encompass approach and departure flight tracks that are not aligned with the runway. High risk and potential noise levels in the 70-to-80-dB CNEL range are the major compatibility factors.
Description: Travis Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility PlanSection 4.1 Compatibility Zones EstablishedIn total, the Air Force Base features six compatibility zones, A, B1, B2, C, D, and E, as well as two overlay zones, the Assault Landing Zone (ALZ) Training Overlay Zone and the Height Review Overlay Zone. Each of the compatibility zones and overlay zones are generally described with tabular information relating to density and intensity requirements and additional zone-specific criteria. The Plan provides additional general, noise, safety, aircraft protection, and overflight regulations and supporting criteria that apply to each of the compatibility zones.Section 4.5 Compatibility Zone C Compatibility Zone C encompasses locations exposed to potential noise in excess of approximately 60 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) together with additional areas occasionally affected by concentrated numbers of low-altitude aircraft overflights. To the greatest extent practical, the boundaries are delineated so as to follow sections, lines, other geographic features, and fixed offset distances from the extended runway centerlines. Developed residential areas within existing city limits are excluded.
Description: Travis Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility PlanSection 4.1 Compatibility Zones EstablishedIn total, the Air Force Base features six compatibility zones, A, B1, B2, C, D, and E, as well as two overlay zones, the Assault Landing Zone (ALZ) Training Overlay Zone and the Height Review Overlay Zone. Each of the compatibility zones and overlay zones are generally described with tabular information relating to density and intensity requirements and additional zone-specific criteria. The Plan provides additional general, noise, safety, aircraft protection, and overflight regulations and supporting criteria that apply to each of the compatibility zones.Section 4.6 Compatibility Zone DCompatibility Zone D includes all other locations beneath any of the Travis AFB airspace protection surfaces delineated in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 as well as areas subject to frequent aircraft overflight. Limitations on the height of structures and notice of aircraft overflights are the only compatibility factors within this zone.
Description: Travis Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility PlanSection 4.1 Compatibility Zones EstablishedIn total, the Air Force Base features six compatibility zones, A, B1, B2, C, D, and E, as well as two overlay zones, the Assault Landing Zone (ALZ) Training Overlay Zone and the Height Review Overlay Zone. Each of the compatibility zones and overlay zones are generally described with tabular information relating to density and intensity requirements and additional zone-specific criteria. The Plan provides additional general, noise, safety, aircraft protection, and overflight regulations and supporting criteria that apply to each of the compatibility zones.Section 4.7 Compatibility Zone E Compatibility Zone E includes the area located between Zone D and the Airport Influence Area (AIA) boundary, which is coterminous with the Solano County boundaries. Zone E requires Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) review for all proposed buildings or structures that are 200 feet or higher above ground level (AGL). There is no limit on the types of land uses, densities, or intensities, although large stadiums and similar uses should be avoided in this compatibility zone.Last edited 04/15/24 by DMachado to accomodate TAFB Zone D without overlap at request of Solano County Planning Dept.
Description: Travis Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility Plan (LUCP)Section 2.2.2 Boundaries of Airport Influence Area The specific limits of the Travis AFB Airport Influence Area (AIA) are:(a) The AIA is comprised of the entirety of Solano County and Compatibility Zones A, B1, B2, C, D, and E, together with the Assault Landing Zone (ALZ) and Height Review Overlay Zones. This data depicts the compatibility zones and the AIA for Travis AFB; additionally, a description of each of the compatibility zones is located in Policy 4.1 (page 17). These compatibility zones also include some portions Contra Costa, Napa, Sacramento, and Yolo Counties.(b) For the portions of the AIA that extend into Contra Costa, Napa, Sacramento, and Yolo counties, these areas are advisory to the Airport Land Use Commissions (ALUCs) within those counties. This LUCP is not binding on any areas located outside Solano County.(c) Within the AIA, all proposed development with structures that are 200 feet above ground level (AGL) or greater in height shall be reviewed by the ALUC and shall be consistent with Land Use Compatibility Criteria.(d) The AIA is the same as the ALUC planning area as referred to in the Public Utilities Code, Section 21675.
Description: This dataset displays a Grid Index for Zoning Maps for the entirety of Solano County, California. This information is currently under review by the County of Solano, Department of Resource Management Planning Services Division and should be utilized for preliminary planning purposes only.This data is required for reference when preparing a rezoning ordinance. Zoning districts are established to promote compatible patterns of land use within the zoning jurisdiction of the City and to establish site development regulations and performance standards appropriate to the purposes of each district and their respective uses. The Zoning Maps assign each piece of property to a "zone" which specifies how the land may be uses. The Zoning Ordinance establishes uses allowed in each zone and standards that must be met within each zone. If a landowner proposes a use that is not allowed in that zone, a change of zone, or Rezone, must occur. A Rezone also requires a public hearing and County Board of Supervisors' approval. Once a Rezone is approved, it remains with the land until any future rezones are approved.Downloaded from Solano County 05/13/24Source: https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=17739Last updated on source: Date unknownPublished: 09/05/2024Uploaded 07/03/2024 by PMeadFields:zoning_grid_num - the number associated with an index grid blockzonging_grid_dir - the letter pertaining to North (N) and South (S) associated with an index grid blockzoning_grid - the number and directional letter pertaining to an index grid block
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: County of Solano, Department of Resource Management Planning Services Division
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: <h2>Solano County Zoning and General Plan Standards</h2><p> The County has adopted community standards in the form of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance to promote the safety, welfare, and orderly development of the County. The construction of any building, and the occupancy or use of that building, must be designed and constructed to meet these community standards. These standards vary depending on what is proposed and where the building is located.</p><p> Zoning districts are established to promote compatible patterns of land use within the zoning jurisdiction of the City and to establish site development regulations and performance standards appropriate to the purposes of each district and their respective uses. The Zoning Maps assign each piece of property to a “zone,” which specifies how the land may be used. The Zoning Ordinance establishes uses allowed in each zone and standards that must be met within each zone. If a landowner proposes a use that is not allowed in that zone, a change of zone, or a Rezone, must occur. A Rezone also requires a public hearing and County Board of Supervisors’ approval. Once a Rezone is approved, it remains with the land until any future rezones are approved.</p><h3>Purpose of Zoning Plan</h3><ul> <li>Protect the established character and social and economic values of agricultural, residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and other areas within the County which have developed in a healthy and orderly manner.</li> <li>Encourage beneficial development of those areas which have grown with conflicting or uneconomic patterns of use.</li> <li>Assist in providing a definite and publicly approved plan of development to guide, control, and stimulate the future growth of the County in accordance with the needs of the County and in proper relation to other land use areas in the region.</li></ul><p> More information is available at <a href="https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rm/planning/faq.asp" target="_blank">Solano County Planning FAQ</a> or contact County of Solano, Department of Resource Management Planning Services Division at <strong>707-784-6765</strong>.</p><h2>Fields Information</h2><table border="1"><tbody><tr> <th>Field Name</th> <th>Field Alias</th> </tr></tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>ZONE_NAME</td> <td>Full Name Zone Classification</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ZONE_ABREV</td> <td>Zone Abbreviation</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MAP_NUMBER</td> <td>Tax Map Index</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Orig_FID</td> <td>Unknown</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Notes</td> <td>Carried over from MGV</td> </tr> </tbody></table><h3>Data Updates</h3><ul> <li><strong>12/28/2023</strong> by DMachado: <ul> <li>Included A-20 zoned parcels adjacent to TAFB.</li> <li>Updated data layer includes LAFCO Resolution No. 2023-15, 2023-16, 2023-17 for City of Fairfield.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>02/01/2024</strong> by BConrad: <ul> <li>BOS Ordinance NO. 2024: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 28, SECTION 28.11 ZONING MAP NO. 12-N, OF THE SOLANO COUNTY CODE TO REZONE A 24.42-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 2316 ROCKVILLE ROAD (APN:0027-200-150) FROM AGRICULTURE TOURIST CENTER (ATC), NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, AND SUISUN VALLEY AGRICULTURE (A-SV-20) TO ATC AND A-SV-20 (Solano Landing Z-22-04).</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>01/15/2025</strong> by BConrad: <ul> <li>Added Middle Green Valley Zoning (Pages 3-50 and 3-51/Figure 3-44), MGV Specific Plan amended 09/28/2021 (<a href="https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=40160" target="_blank">Plan Document</a>); received 10/2024 from Dept. of Resource Management.</li> <li>New Zoning Categories: <ul> <li><em>Open Lands</em>: Natural (OL-N), Recreation (OL-R)</li> <li><em>Agriculture</em>: Watershed (AG-WS), Preserve (AG-P), Agriculture (AG-R)</li> <li><em>Residential</em>: Rural Farm (RF), Rural Meadow (RM), Rural Neighborhood (RN), Rural Mixed-Use Center (RC)</li> <li><em>Community Service</em>: Community Services (CS) – updated to MGV-CS to avoid conflict with Commercial Service, Public Services (PS) – (While Public Services is shown in the Specific Plan, there is no PS zoning designation in this data.)</li> <li><em>Overlays</em>: Agriculture Tourism Overlay (ATO), Neighborhood Commercial Overlay (NCO)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>03/16/2025</strong> by DMachado: <ul> <li>Updated zoning to account for BOS Ordinance NO. 2024-1856</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>04/18/2025</strong> by DMachado: <ul> <li>Updated zoning by dissolving features to minimize density of rows.</li> </ul> </li></ul><p><em>Metadata revised 04/18/2025 by DMachado, Department of Information Technology</em></p>
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Data source:
https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rm/planning/zoning_regulations.asp
https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rm/planning/zoning_maps.asp
https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/SolanoCounty/#!/SolanoCounty2800/SolanoCounty2800.html
The Solano County Code is current through Ordinance 1858, passed November 5, 2024.
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: The Travis Reserve Area Zoning Overlay (TRA Overlay) establishes land use regulations for areas surrounding Travis Air Force Base (AFB) to preserve land for future base expansion and limit incompatible uses. The overlay aligns with the Solano County General Plan and was ratified by voters in Measure T (2008).The overlay applies to Compatibility Zones A, B1, B2, C, and D of the Travis Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility Plan (LUCP) and is implemented through Ordinance No. 2023-1849.Key ProvisionsPermitted Uses: Agriculture, grazing, and habitat conservation. Agricultural structures under 2,500 sq. ft. and below 25 feet in height are allowed.Restricted Uses: No new residential development or conservation/mitigation banks for avian species. Other land uses require a minor use permit unless otherwise specified.Zoning Code Updates: The TRA Overlay was added to Zoning Maps 7-S, 8-S, 13-N, and 14-N and Section 28.65 of the Solano County Code to define allowable land uses.Coordination: The County will continue working with Solano LAFCO, Suisun City, Fairfield, and Vacaville to ensure long-term agricultural use and protect future base expansion potential.Environmental Review: Impacts were evaluated in the 2008 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (Resolution No. 2008-182), and no further environmental review is required.This overlay ensures compatibility with Travis AFB operations, restricts development that may interfere with aviation safety, and preserves the long-term economic viability of the base for Solano County.Ordinance No. 2023-1849 was approved by the Solano County Board of Supervisors on June 13, 2023. This dataset was updated and published by DoIT GIS as of 02/04/25.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Solano County, based on Resolution 2023-1849. Source: https://solano.granicus.com/DocumentViewer.php?file=solano_de1066ae53fe3042685128fcb1ea3225.pdf&view=1
Solano County Airport Land Use Commission
Description: <div style="text-align:Left;"><div><div><p><span>Data sourced from page 7 of this resource: https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=6492.</span></p><p><span>Layers include depictions of the:</span></p><ul><li><p><span>Vacaville-Fairfield-Solano Greenbelt</span></p></li><li><p><span>Travis Reserve Area</span></p></li><li><p><span>Agricultural Reserve Overlay</span></p></li><li><p><span>Tri-City/County Cooperative Planning Area</span></p></li><li><p><span>Resource Conservation Overlay</span></p></li></ul><p><span>Data uploaded by DMachado 06/24/24</span></p><p><span>Data provided by Solano County Planning Services Division on 05/02/23 and updated with City of Fairfield Greenbelt 04/04/24. </span></p><p><span>Updated with Planning Services Division note of Ordinance 2023-1849 to Zoning Overlay ZT-23-03 on 05/13/24</span></p><p><span>Updated to remove Travis Reserve Area per Planning Services Division request 06/24/24.</span></p><p><span>Updated to revise symbology in Tri-City Planning Area per Planning Services Division request 3/16/2025</span></p><p><span>More information is available at https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rm/planning/faq.asp or contact County of Solano, Department of Resource Management Planning Services Division at 707-784-6765.</span></p></div></div></div>
Description: “Greenbelt” is a general term that refers to natural, undeveloped, and/or agricultural lands that surround urban areas. These lands may include open spaces, parks, farms and ranches, wildlands, or a combination thereof—as designated by cities, counties, special districts, and other jurisdictions. Greenbelts encompass many different types and scales of landscapes such as wildlife corridors, streams, wetlands, and recreational parks as well as grazing lands, orchards, and vineyardsThis feature class includes depictions of the Vacaville-Dixon Greenbelt and the Davis-Dixon Greenbelt overlay boundaries, as documented in the Dixon General Plan 2040, Figure NE-1, Open Space and Agricultural Land, Page 3-4. Data created based on parcel boundaries and diagram on page 3 of this resource: https://www.cityofdixon.us/media/CommunityDevelopment/General%20Plan%20Update/GP%20by%20Chapter/02%20Natural%20Environment-Updated_03.21.23.pdf.The Vacaville-Dixon Greenbelt, which the City of Dixon purchased in partnership with the City of Vacaville in 1996, contains 1,003 acres of agricultural lands. In 2005, the City of Dixon partnered with the City of Davis, UC Davis, California Department of Conservation, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resource Conservation Service to begin purchasing land for the Davis-Dixon Greenbelt, which currently contains over 400 acres of farmland, and is managed by the Solano Land Trust. Conserving these important agricultural resources is critical for maintaining Dixon’s agricultural character, and for contributing to air and water quality, local habitat, economic sustainability, and quality of life.This feature class also includes a depiction of the Vacaville-Fairfield-Solano Greenbelt. Data sourced from page 7 of this resource: https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=6492, and documented on page 26 of the Vacaville General Plan Chapter 2 Land Use Element, https://www.cityofvacaville.gov/government/community-development/general-plan/general-plan-documents.The Vacaville-Fairfield-Solano Greenbelt Agreement identifies approximately 4,100 acres between Vacaville and Fairfield that must be preserved to serve as a permanent separation between the urban areas of Fairfield and Vacaville. This area must be maintained in agriculture and open space uses consistent with the provisions of the agreement. The Vacaville-Dixon Greenbelt Agreement identifies approximately 1,000 acres of land located between Vacaville and Dixon that have been purchased by the Vacaville-Dixon Greenbelt Authority (VDGA) to be maintained in productive agriculture or as other open space uses mutually agreed upon by VDGA. Data provided by Solano County Planning Department on 01/04/2024. Last Updated 05/12/24 based on 2011 changes to Greenbelt from City of Fairfield GIS.Uploaded 05/12/2024, DMachado, Solano County Department of Information Technology.
Name: Solano County Unincorporated General Plan 2008 Updated
Display Field: name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: <h2>Solano County Unincorporated General Plan Layer</h2><p> This dataset represents the <strong>General Plan</strong> data layer for the <strong>unincorporated areas of Solano County, California</strong>. It serves as the guiding policy document for both land development and conservation through the year 2030, supporting a vision of sustainability, environmental vitality, economic strength, and social equity.</p><p> Under California law, every county and city must adopt a comprehensive, long-term General Plan to direct physical development within their jurisdiction. General Plans act as blueprints for growth and conservation, with goals and policies forming the foundation for decisions about land use, zoning, and development. In Solano County, all zoning ordinances, development codes, specific plans, and public or private development proposals must be consistent with the General Plan.</p><p> For more information, visit the <a href="https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rm/planning/faq.asp" target="_blank">Solano County Planning FAQ</a> or contact the County of Solano, Department of Resource Management – Planning Services Division at <strong>707-784-6765</strong>.</p><h2>General Plan Update</h2><ul> <li>Symbolized by attribute field <strong>“GP_desc”</strong>.</li></ul><h2>Data Updates</h2><ul> <li><strong>Updated:</strong> April 2, 2024 – Solano County Department of Information Technology</li> <li><strong>Updated:</strong> June 24, 2024 – Solano County Department of Information Technology (to account for overlays within the service)</li> <li><strong>Updated:</strong> April 18, 2025 – Solano County Department of Information Technology (dissolved to minimize density of rows)</li> <li><strong>Uploaded to:</strong> Solano County GIS Portal by the GIS Services Team</li> <li><strong>Sharing Level:</strong> Public</li></ul><h2>Table of Key Fields</h2><table border="1"> <tbody> <tr> <th>Field Name</th> <th>Description</th> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>OBJECTID</strong></td> <td>Unique feature identifier</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>SHAPE</strong></td> <td>Polygon ZM (geometry type)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Name</strong></td> <td>Full name of Land Use Districts</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>GPLU</strong></td> <td>General Plan Land Use coded value</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>GP_desc</strong></td> <td>General Plan Land Use full name from the coded values</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>SHAPE_Length</strong></td> <td>Length of the feature geometry</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>SHAPE_Area</strong></td> <td>Area of the feature geometry</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This dataset is considering an approved product by the Resource Management team.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Data was created via a collaboration between the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) and the Department of Resource Management. Approval criteria was set by Narcisa Untal for the RM department.
Description: These boundaries represent the Garbage Service Areas within Solano County. They are represented nominally by edge-alignment to the decennial census blocks within the County. Some boundaries deviate in instances where the garbage service providers identified boundaries circa 2008 that were retained as of March 2023. This dataset is considering a an approved product by the Resource Management team as of February 2024. Last updated February 2024.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Data was created via a collaboration between the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) and the Department of Resource Management. Approval criteria was set by Narcisa Untal for the RM department.
Description: Fire Hazard Severity Zone classes from the map dated February 24, 2025.Under the purpose of fire safety and prevention, and by statutory authority, The State Fire Marshal shall classify lands within Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) into fire hazard severity zones. Each zone shall embrace relatively homogeneous lands and shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors present, including areas where winds have been identified by the department as a major cause of wildfire spread.The California laws and regulations associated with Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA are found in California Government Code 51175-51189, and describe the objectives and and processes by which these data are developed, transmitted as a recommendation to local government agencies, and the subsequent required local ordinance adoption and documentation processes to see the zones finalized.Delivery of Recommended LRA FHSZ data and maps is being phased by regional areas of the state. This data set represents Phase 2 or the process, and includes the following counties:[Alameda, Contra Costa, Del Norte, Humboldt, Marin, Mendocino, Merced, Napa, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Yolo] Details on the planned schedule and an index to all phase areas can be found at website: https://fire-hazard-severity-zones-rollout-calfire-forestry.hub.arcgis.com/pages/access-mapData was clipped to Solano County Boundaries by Solano DoIT GIS team.Per Solano County Board of Supervisors ordinance 2025-1862 effective July 4, 2025 this layer reflects the reviewed and accepted recommendations by the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) based on 2025 updates to the same.Created by Solano DoIT GIS Team 06/10/2025
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Datasets from numerous sources were used in the modeling process by CalFire, https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/
Name: HISTORICAL - Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) April 2024
Display Field: sra
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) classifications and map, as mandated by California law and implemented by the State Fire Marshal. The latest FHSZ map, issued on September 29, 2023, was formally adopted on January 31, 2024, and became effective on April 1, 2024. It delineates lands within state responsibility areas into three fire hazard levels: moderate, high, and very high. These designations are determined based on an array of factors such as fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and wind patterns that contribute to wildfire spread.Developed through a science-based model, the FHSZ assessments consider fire history, potential fuel sources, predicted fire behavior, terrain, and typical fire weather conditions, aiming for a predictive outlook over 30 to 50 years. Unlike risk evaluations, these hazard classifications do not account for mitigative actions like home hardening, wildfire history, or fuel reduction efforts but focus on inherent physical conditions that influence fire likelihood and potential intensity.The FHSZs serve several purposes: they are used to designate areas where California’s wildland urban interface building codes apply to new buildings; they can be a factor in real estate disclosure; and local governments consider fire hazard severity in the safety elements of their general plans. Moderate, high, and very high FHSZs are found in areas where the State has financial responsibility for fire protection and prevention (SRA). Only very high FHSZs are found in Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs).Regulatory adherence mandates that this classification system and its accompanying maps follow the procedures set by the Administrative Procedures Act, transitioning from Title 14, Section 1280.01 to Title 19, Section 2201 of the California Code of Regulations. This shift signifies an administrative update without altering the geographic portrayal of FHSZs. The updated regulations are integral to enhancing wildfire preparedness and mitigation strategies across California, rooted in rigorous evaluation and a comprehensive understanding of fire behavior and hazards.Fields:sra - SRA: Classifications for State Responsibility Area (SRA)fhsz - FHSZ: Classifications from Moderate, High, Very High fhsz_description - FHSZ_Description matching classification as 1, 2, 3Data Uploaded 4/15/2024, DMachado, Solano County Department of Information TechnologyLast updated 2/25/25, Solano DoIT GIS Team, to extend data out to 50 mile boundary past Solano County boundary.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Datasets from numerous sources were used in the modeling process by CalFire, https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/
Description: CAL FIRE has a legal responsibility to provide fire protection on all State Responsibility Area (SRA) lands, which are defined based on land ownership, population density and land use. For example, CAL FIRE does not have responsibility for densely populated areas, incorporated cities, agricultural lands, or lands administered by the federal government. The SRA dataset provides areas of legal responsibility for fire protection, including State Responsibility Areas (SRA), Federal Responsibility Areas (FRA), and Local Responsibility Areas (LRA). SRA designations undergo a thorough 5 year review cycle, as well as annual updates for incorporations/annexations, error fixes, and ownership changes (automatic changes that do not require Board of Forestry approval).This service represents the latest official version, and is updated when new versions are released. As of May 1st, 2023, this represents SRA 23_1. Changes from SRA22_2 include those resulting from acquisitions and disposals of federal lands transmitted through the yearly California Wildfire Coordinating Group (CWCG) Direct Protection Area (DPA) agreement process, from city annexations and de-annexations, from changes in county parcel boundaries, as well as corrections to any data errors discovered during the editing process.Data uploaded 10/20/2023 by DMachadoData sourced: https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/3991e5168faf47dfa0953caa1fe53bae/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=default&output=html on 10/20/2023
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: This dataset created and stewarded by CAL FIRE - FRAP. Other credits: Numerous federal agencies have provided data that help us to identify FRA lands (BLM, U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs).
Description: Service provides data to decision makers for use in planning the present and future use of California's agricultural land resources. The data is a 2020 inventory of agricultural resources for general planning purposes and has a minimum mapping unit of ten acres.Established in 1982, Government Code Section 65570 mandates FMMP to report biennially on even numbered years, the conversion of farmland and grazing land, and to provide maps and data to local government and the public. The Important Farmland survey area is based on Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) modern soil surveys covering most non-governmental lands in California; 51 counties are fully or partially surveyed during the 2020 map update. Soil surveys specific to National Forests or other government land units are not surveyed. Beginning in 2000, SSURGO digital soil information was incorporated into the Solano County Important Farmland data and the 2016 data began to incorporate the new NRCS Gridded Soil Survey (gSSURGO). Data subsequent to 2000 may have acreage and soil line differences due to incorporation of newer NRCS-SSURGO or gSSURGO editions.Prior to the availability of SSURGO or gSSURGO, soil information was hand-transferred from the paper soil surveys. Older versions of the data have not been modified. The land use minimum mapping unit of ten acres has not changed, but digital soil units of less than one acre occur in the gSSURGO-enhanced Important Farmland data. The data between 2000 and 2014 incorporates SSURGO and the interaction of land use and soil components resulted in units of less than ten acres for categories such as Other Land. The 2016 data incorporates gSSURGO and will no longer merge resulting polygons less than one acre for any map category for that and future updates. For more information on gSSURGO, contact the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service: https://www.nrcs.usda.govUSDA NRCS soil survey CA095 (Solano County).Solano County initial mapping year - 1984.Geodetic Model:1984 to 2012 - North American Datum of 19272014 to 2020 - North American Datum of 19832020 county boundaries: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) 2018 version (cnty 18_2) of California Counties GIS data. https://frap.fire.ca.gov2020 Imagery source: USDA Farm Service Agency - National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP); Summer 2020; True color; 1 meter resolution. https://www.fsa.usda.govGoogle Incorporated; Various dates; True color; Google Maps and Streetview. https://www.google.com/mapsUploaded 02/23/2024 by DMachado, Solano County Department of Information Technology.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: A citation for the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program on any map products, graphic media, or data analyses based on the data is appreciated.
Important Farmland 2018 for Solano County. State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection.
Available online at https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp
https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/server/rest/services/DLRP/CaliforniaImportantFarmland_2020/FeatureServer
Description: Service provides data to decision makers for use in planning the present and future use of California's agricultural land resources. The data is a 2018 inventory of agricultural resources for general planning purposes and has a minimum mapping unit of ten acres.Established in 1982, Government Code Section 65570 mandates FMMP to report biennially on even numbered years, the conversion of farmland and grazing land, and to provide maps and data to local government and the public. The Important Farmland survey area is based on Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) modern soil surveys covering most non-governmental lands in California; 51 counties are fully or partially surveyed during the 2018 map update. Soil surveys specific to National Forests or other government land units are not surveyed. Beginning in 2000, SSURGO digital soil information was incorporated into the Solano County Important Farmland data and the 2016 data began to incorporate the new NRCS Gridded Soil Survey (gSSURGO). Data subsequent to 2000 may have acreage and soil line differences due to incorporation of newer NRCS-SSURGO or gSSURGO editions.Prior to the availability of SSURGO or gSSURGO, soil information was hand-transferred from the paper soil surveys. Older versions of the data have not been modified. The land use minimum mapping unit of ten acres has not changed, but digital soil units of less than one acre occur in the gSSURGO-enhanced Important Farmland data. The data between 2000 and 2014 incorporates SSURGO and the interaction of land use and soil components resulted in units of less than ten acres for categories such as Other Land. The 2016 data incorporates gSSURGO and will no longer merge resulting polygons less than one acre for any map category for that and future updates. For more information on gSSURGO, contact the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service: https://www.nrcs.usda.govUSDA NRCS soil survey CA095 (Solano County).Amador County initial mapping year - 1984.Geodetic Model: 1984 to 2012 - North American Datum of 1927; 2014 to 2018 - North American Datum of 1983.2018 county boundaries: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) 2018 version (cnty 18_2) of California Counties GIS data. https://frap.fire.ca.govThe total area surveyed changed in 2018 due to the adoption of an updated county boundary file. The change was a net decrease of 158 acres.2018 Imagery source: USDA Farm Service Agency - National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP); Summer 2018; True color; 1 meter resolution. https://www.fsa.usda.govGoogle Incorporated; Various dates; True color; Google Maps and Streetview. https://www.google.com/mapsUploaded 02/23/2024 by DMachado, Solano County Department of Information Technology.
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Important Farmland 2018 for Solano County. State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection. Available online at https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp
https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/server/rest/services/DLRP/CaliforniaImportantFarmland_2018/FeatureServer
Copyright Text: This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference source. This is public information and may be interpreted by organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.
Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only. Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date of this shipment from the ordering site.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any of its agencies are liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of these data sets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: The Williamson Act, also known as the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, enables local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for the purpose of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use. In return, landowners receive property tax assessments which are much lower than normal because they are based upon farming and open space uses as opposed to full market value. This data is updated annually each December.For more information please see https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/wa.Data Uploaded 12/16/2022, BConrad, GIS Analyst, Solano County Dept. of Information Technology.
Description: The Williamson Act, also known as the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, enables local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for the purpose of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use. In return, landowners receive property tax assessments which are much lower than normal because they are based upon farming and open space uses as opposed to full market value. Designations:Prime Agricultural LandLand which is enrolled under California Land Conservation Act contract and meets any of the following criteria (as set forth under California Government Code Section 51201): Land which qualifies for rating as class I or class II in the Natural Resources Conservation Service land use capability classifications; Land which qualifies for rating 80 to 100 in the Storie Index Rating; Land which supports livestock used for the production of food and fiber and which has an annual carrying capacity equivalent to at least one animal unit per acre as defined by the United States Department of Agriculture; Land planted with fruit or nut-bearing trees, vines, bushes or crops which have a nonbearing period of less than five years and which will normally return during the commercial bearing period on an annual basis from the production of unprocessed agricultural plant production not less than two hundred dollars per acre; Land which has returned from the production of unprocessed agricultural plant production and has an annual gross value of not less than two hundred dollars per acre for three of the previous five years.Nonprime Agricultural LandLand which is enrolled under California Land Conservation Act contract and does not meet any of the criteria for classification as Prime Agricultural Land. Non-Prime Land is defined as Open Space Land of Statewide Significance under the California Open Space Subvention Act (see California Government Code Section 16143), and may be identified as such in other documents. Most Non-Prime Land is in agricultural uses such as grazing or non-irrigated crops. However, Non-Prime Land may also include other open space uses which are compatible with agriculture and consistent with local general plans.NonrenewalEnrolled lands for which non-renewal has been filed pursuant to Government Code Section 51245. Upon the filing of non-renewal, the existing contract remains in effect for the balance of the period remaining on the contract. During the non-renewal process, the annual tax assessment gradually increases. At the end of the 9 year non-renewal period, the contract expires and the land is no longer enforceably restricted.Farmland Security ZoneEnrolled parcels containing either Prime or Non-Prime agricultural land restricted by a 20 year contract pursuant to Government Code Section 51296.Mixed Enrollment Agriculture LandEnrolled lands containing a combination of Prime, Non-Prime, Open Space Easement, or other contracted or enrolled lands not yet delineated by the county.This data is updated annually each December.California Department of Conservation: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/WilliamsonAct/Data received 02/15/2024, Travis Kroger, Associate Planner, Planning Services Division, Department of Resource ManagementData Updated 04/30/2024, BConrad, GIS Analyst, Solano County Dept. of Information Technology.Uploaded to Solano County GIS Portal, DMachado 05/04/2024
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/WilliamsonAct/
For more information please see https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/wa
Farl Grundy
Associate Environmental Planner
Division of Land Resource Protection
Williamson Act / CEQA
California Department of Conservation
715 P Street, MS 1904
Sacramento, CA, 95814
E: Farl.Grundy@conservation.ca.gov
C: (916) 617-0522
Description: Updated draft version of Unincorporated Solano County Agricultural Regions. Data originally extracted from CACGIS02 on 08/23/22. This is a working draft layer which has been edited to align with current city, county, and agricultural region boundaries. The data is currently under review for accuracy. All information contained within is for planning purposes only, and is subject to scheduled updates and edits as needed.The authoritative version of Solano County Agricultural Regions data is found in the Solano County General Plan, Chapter 3 Agriculture, Figure AG-4 (https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=6493). Updated 04/20/2023, BConrad, Department of Information Technology
Service Item Id: 44eeaa3c51234a64af0653039c5c2a25
Copyright Text: Solano County General Plan https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rm/planning
Description: The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) is a compilation of GIS data that comprises a nationwide digital Flood Insurance Rate Map. The GIS data and services are designed to provide the user with the ability to determine the flood zone, base flood elevation, and floodway status for a particular location. It also has information about the NFIP communities, map panels, cross sections, hydraulic structures, Coastal Barrier Resource System, and base maps such as road, stream, and public land survey data. Through flood studies, FEMA produces Flood Insurance Study Reports, FIRM Panels, and FIRM Databases. FIRM Databases that become effective are incorporated into the NFHL. Updates to the NFHL are issued through Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) and Letters of Map Amendment (LOMAs). Continuously updated, the NFHL serves as a Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map representing the current effective flood data for those communities where maps have been digitized. NFHL data can be viewed with widely available GIS software, including freely available programs that work with GIS shapefiles.Data was extracted from source NFHL data layer here: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/downloadProduct?productTypeID=NFHL&productSubTypeID=NFHL_COUNTY_DATA&productID=NFHL_06095Caccompanying files are saved: \\gis.solanocountygis.local\e\GISAzureProjects\PRJ001_100\PRJ131_Hydrology\IncomingData\FEMA
Color: [230, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Unique Value Renderer: Field 1: floodzone Field 2: N/A Field 3: N/A Field Delimiter: , Default Symbol:
N/A
Default Label: N/A UniqueValueInfos:
Value: 100 Label: FEMA/DWR Awareness/Regional Studies /USACE Comprehensive Study Description: State Flood data collected from the following agency and collaboration studies:<br/><br/><b>DWR Awareness</b> = Awareness floodplains identify the 100-year flood hazard areas using approximate assessment procedures. These floodplains will be shown simply as flood prone areas without specific depths and other flood hazard data.<br/><br/><b>Regional/Special Studies</b> = Floodplains developed from approximate assessment procedures from local agencies.<br/><br/><b>USACE Comprehensive Study</b> = Floodplains developed from 2002 Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Comprehensive Study Symbol:
Unique Value Renderer: Field 1: floodzone Field 2: N/A Field 3: N/A Field Delimiter: , Default Symbol:
N/A
Default Label: N/A UniqueValueInfos:
Value: 500 Label: FEMA/Regional Studies/USACE Comprehensive Study Description: State Flood data collected from the following agency and collaboration studies:<br/><br/><b>Regional/Special Studies</b> = Floodplains developed from approximate assessment procedures from local agencies.<br/><br/><b>USACE Comprehensive Study</b> = Floodplains developed from 2002 Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Comprehensive Study Symbol: